Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom | Nu.1,95,000 | Nu.1,49,000 ✓ |
| Engine | 349 | 349 |
| Power (PS) | 20.2 ✓ | 20.2 ✓ |
| Torque (Nm) | 27 ✓ | 27 ✓ |
| Claimed Mileage (kmpl) | 35 | 36 ✓ |
| Seat height (mm) | 805 | 790 ✓ |
| Kerb weight (kg) | 195 | 177 ✓ |
| Ground clearance (mm) | 170 ✓ | 150 |
| Top speed (km/h) | 114 ✓ | 114 ✓ |
Dost verdict
- Hunter 350 is cheaper by 46,000.
- Hunter 350 returns better claimed mileage.
- Hunter 350 has the lower seat, which is easier for shorter riders.
- Hunter 350 is lighter, so it's easier in traffic.
Buy the Classic 350 if you value timeless style.
Buy the Hunter 350 if you value agile.
Generated from verified specs only (no invented numbers).